Objective: To compare the haemodynamic effects of pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) with volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) in patients after cardiac surgery.
Design: Prospective clinical study.
Setting: Post-operative cardiac surgical ICU.
Subjects: Twenty sequential elective adult patients with no previous chronic lung disease and aged less than 70 years old.
Interventions: One hour after ICU admission and receiving mechanical ventilation utilising sinusoidal flow, patients were divided into two groups according to cardiac index (CI): group I: CI > 2.5 l/min/M2 and group II: CI < 2.5 l/min/M2. They were submitted randomly to 15 minutes' PC or VC mode, a 30-minute wash-out period of mechanical ventilation with a sinusoidal flow pattern, and then alternate PC or VC mode for 15 more minutes. Data were statistically compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a significance level of 5%. Sedatives and muscle relaxants were given as necessary.
Endpoints: Data were obtained at the end of 15 minutes under each ventilatory mode, observing a 30-minute interval between each.
Measurements: Standard cardiorespiratory parameters were measured or calculated using conventional monitoring (including cardiac output), Qs/Qt, A-aDO2 alveolar-arterial oxygen difference, peak inspiratory pressure, mean airway pressure and dynamic compliance (C).
Results: No significant differences between PCV and VCV modes, or between groups, were seen in MPAP, MAP, PCWP, RAP, heart rate, O2ER, VO2I, Paw, C, A-aDO2 and Qs/Qt. However, DO2I (p = 0.0063), LVSWI, (p = 0.0001) and RVSWI (p = 0.0053) showed a statistically significant difference between groups I and II. No influence of VCV or PCV on these parameters was seen. There was a slight significant difference between groups for PVR (p = 0.0205). In contrast, CI (p = 0.0001) and SVR (p = 0.0062) showed significant differences among groups, but also a significantly favourable effect of PCV over VCV (p = 0.0239 and p = 0.0318 respectively). Finally, a significant reduction (p = 0.0001) in peak inspiratory pressure with PCV was observed.
Conclusion: PC and VC ventilatory modes had comparable effects on patients with preserved or depressed cardiac output. Patients ventilated with PCV showed significantly higher values for cardiac index, a decreased SVR, as well as significantly lower values for inspiratory pressure when compared with VCV patients.