Challenging the pressure sore paradigm

J Wound Care. 1999 Apr;8(4):187-90. doi: 10.12968/jowc.1999.8.4.25869.

Abstract

This study determines the effectiveness of a new low-unit-cost support system in patients at very high risk of developing pressure sores. In a prospective randomised controlled trial, a low-pressure inflatable mattress and cushion system (Repose) was compared to a dynamic support mattress (Nimbus II) used in conjunction with an alternating-pressure cushion (Alpha TranCell) in 80 patients with fractured neck of femur and high scores on a pressure sore risk assessment scale. All patients received best standard care, including turning at regular intervals. Skin condition was assessed in 17 locations on admission, preoperatively, and seven and 14 days postoperatively. No difference was found between the groups in skin condition or the occurrence and severity of pressure sores at any time point.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Beds / economics
  • Beds / standards*
  • Beds / supply & distribution
  • Clinical Nursing Research
  • Female
  • Femoral Neck Fractures / complications
  • Femoral Neck Fractures / surgery*
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Nursing Assessment
  • Postoperative Complications / etiology
  • Postoperative Complications / nursing
  • Postoperative Complications / prevention & control*
  • Pressure Ulcer / etiology
  • Pressure Ulcer / nursing
  • Pressure Ulcer / prevention & control*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Risk Factors
  • Severity of Illness Index