Placement of endoscopic naso-biliary drainage does not preclude subsequent percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage

J Gastroenterol. 2000;35(6):445-9. doi: 10.1007/s005350070090.

Abstract

We prospectively investigated whether the placement of endoscopic naso-biliary drainage (ENBD) precluded percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD). In 40 patients, the caliber of the intrahepatic bile duct was measured prior to ENBD by ultrasonography. When PTBD was required after ENBD, the ENBD catheter was clamped for 1 to 2 h before PTBD, and its caliber was again measured at the time of PTBD. When PTBD was performed within 7 days (mean, 1.8 days) after ENBD (n = 27), the size of the intrahepatic bile duct was 5.0 +/- 2.3 mm before and 4.6 +/- 2.3 mm after ENBD. There was no significant difference between these values (P > 0.5). When PTBD was performed 8 to 40 days (mean, 17.8 days) after ENBD (n = 13), the bile duct diameter was significantly reduced, from 4.2 +/- 1.5 mm (pre-ENBD) to 1.8 +/- 1.7 mm (post-ENBD) (P < 0.05). When PTBD was conducted within 7 days (mean, 1.8 days) after ENBD, previous ENBD did not induce collapse of the bile duct, if the ENBD catheter was clamped for 1 to 2 h before the puncture of the bile duct.

MeSH terms

  • Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic*
  • Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde
  • Cholestasis, Intrahepatic / therapy*
  • Drainage / methods*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prospective Studies