Potential roles for quantitative ultrasound in the management of osteoporosis

Med J Aust. 2000 Oct 2;173(7):355-8. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2000.tb125686.x.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the validity of four models for the role of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) in the management of osteoporosis.

Design: Cross-sectional survey and review of literature.

Settings: Nuclear medicine departments of three teaching hospitals in Sydney.

Subjects: 1000 women aged 22 to 88 years (mean, 59 years) referred for assessment of osteoporotic fracture risk.

Main outcome measures: BMD categories as defined by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) of the lumbar spine and proximal femur, and QUS category as defined by calcaneal ultrasound stiffness; prevalence of DEXA-defined osteoporosis in the different QUS categories.

Results: In women with QUS Achilles stiffness < or = 70 the prevalence of axial osteoporosis was 51%, whereas in the group with stiffness > 70 the prevalence of axial osteoporosis was 8%. In women 65 years and over the corresponding values were 59% and 17%.

Conclusions: Of the four possible models for QUS, the use of QUS for the estimation of BMD, or in a "standalone" model, can not be recommended at the current time. The model of QUS as a "prescreening" modality may be acceptable assuming adequate education of clinicians and patients of its limitations, particularly the risk of false negatives. The model of QUS as one factor in a composite risk factor assessment of patients is promising but more data are required.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Absorptiometry, Photon
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Bone Density*
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Osteoporosis* / diagnostic imaging*
  • Osteoporosis* / physiopathology
  • Prevalence
  • Random Allocation
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Risk Factors
  • Ultrasonography
  • Urban Population