Differences between cough and Valsalva leak-point pressure in stress incontinent women

Neurourol Urodyn. 2000;19(6):677-81. doi: 10.1002/1520-6777(2000)19:6<677::aid-nau5>3.0.co;2-j.

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the relationship between Valsalva leak-point pressure (VLPP) and cough leak-point pressure (CLPP). Sixty women with stress urinary incontinence were included. One woman was excluded from evaluation because of detrusor instability. At a bladder volume of 200-300 mL (mean, 284; standard deviation, 29) CLPP and VLPP were measured in the sitting position. Intra-abdominal pressure was recorded with a rectal balloon catheter. A standardized pad test and multi-channel urodynamics were performed. VLPP was significantly lower than CLPP (58.9+/-27.6 versus 112.5+/-46.9 cm H(2)O, P<0.0001). Although CLPP was negative in two women only, VLPP was negative in 24 of 59 women (40.1%). If intrinsic sphincter deficiency was defined as a leak-point pressure of 65 cm H(2)O, 16.9% of women fulfilled this criterion using the CLPP compared to 35.6% if the VLPP is used. In conclusion, coughing and Valsalva seem to result in a different reaction of the pelvic floor.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Cough*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Pressure
  • Urinary Bladder / physiopathology
  • Urinary Incontinence, Stress / diagnosis*
  • Urinary Incontinence, Stress / physiopathology*
  • Urodynamics*
  • Valsalva Maneuver*