Reaction time in automated kinetic perimetry: effects of stimulus luminance, eccentricity, and movement direction

Vision Res. 2001 Jul;41(16):2157-64. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00088-8.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the effects of stimulus eccentricity and luminance level on the reaction time (RT) of young normal volunteers during automated kinetic campimetry.

Methods: We used a specially designed video-campimetric device equipped with a continuous infrared (IR) pupillographic fixation control (Tübingen Computer Campimeter) and recorded reaction times upon presenting horizontally moving small circular stimuli (size 26'; constant angular velocity 2 degrees /s) starting at 16 locations within the central 30 degrees -radius of the visual field. Two different levels of stimulus luminance were used (41.6 cd/m(2) and 110 cd/m(2)), while background luminance was 10 cd/m(2). Each stimulus was presented a total of six times in a randomized order. Subjects were 12 healthy young individuals (aged 21-30 years) with normal ophthalmic examinations. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed on the data.

Results: RTs showed considerable inter- and intra-individual variation with individual least squares means (LSM, fitted values of a linear model) ranging from 305 to 454 ms, and residual standard deviation (R.S.D.) 66 ms. Reaction times did not differ significantly as a function of stimulus direction (P>0.6). Higher luminance levels produced significantly reduced reaction times for all stimulus locations and directions (mean reduction: 16 ms; P<0.0001). Reaction times increased with increasing eccentricity, in the mean by 1.8 ms per degree of visual angle, from 365+/-4 ms (S.E.M.) foveally, to 407+/-2 ms at 30 degrees eccentricity; (P<0.0001).

Conclusions: Automated kinetic perimetry should be designed to cope with significant, variable interindividual response characteristics. Other stimulus related factors, such as eccentricity or luminance level, have a significant but comparatively small effect on reaction time within the central 30 degrees -radius visual field in healthy young individuals.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Analysis of Variance
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Individuality
  • Least-Squares Analysis
  • Lighting*
  • Linear Models
  • Male
  • Motion Perception / physiology*
  • Psychophysics
  • Reaction Time / physiology*
  • Visual Field Tests / methods*
  • Visual Fields / physiology*