Effect of combining ultrasonography and ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy findings for the diagnosis of thyroid nodules

Eur J Surg. 2001 Sep;167(9):656-61. doi: 10.1080/11024150152619273.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the accuracy of ultrasonography and cytology in predicting malignancy in thyroid nodules.

Design: Prospective open study.

Setting: Thyroid centre, Japan.

Subjects: 329 nodules in 309 patients examined by a new ultrasound scanner and ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy.

Interventions: Comparison of ultrasonographic, cytological, and combined diagnosis with the histological diagnosis.

Main outcome measures: Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of each diagnostic method.

Results: The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy were 84%, 87%, 85% for cytological diagnosis, and 82%, 91%, and 87% for ultrasonographic diagnosis. By using ultrasonographic diagnosis when cytological specimens were inadequate or gave false negative results, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy went up to 89%, 91%, and 90%, respectively. We could not diagnose follicular carcinomas accurately by combined cytology and ultrasonography.

Conclusion: The combination of ultrasonography and cytology improves the accuracy of diagnosis of thyroid nodules, but is less effective with follicular tumours.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Biopsy, Needle / instrumentation*
  • Diagnosis, Differential
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prospective Studies
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Thyroid Nodule / diagnostic imaging*
  • Thyroid Nodule / pathology*
  • Ultrasonography