Thirty-five millimeter versus digital photography: comparison of photographic quality and clinical evaluation

Facial Plast Surg. 1999;15(2):101-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1064306.

Abstract

The objective of this article is to assess the quality of digital images versus standard 35-mm photodocumentation and to undertake a comparative assessment of 35-mm and digital photography in a clinical setting in facial plastic surgery. For evaluation of image quality, 10 subjects had images captured via a conventional 35-mm single lens reflex (SLR) camera and a digital camera under identical lighting conditions. The digital images were transferred to computer hard drive and processed for production of slides. Direct side-by-side comparison of projected images was performed by the authors. The standard photographic slides were of slightly finer detail and crispness than the computer-generated images. In a clinical setting, the quality of both the 35-mm and digital photographs enables complete preoperative evaluation and assessment of postsurgical outcome.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Face / surgery*
  • Humans
  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / instrumentation*
  • Information Storage and Retrieval
  • Medical Records Systems, Computerized
  • Patient Education as Topic
  • Photography / instrumentation*
  • Photography / methods*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Surgery, Plastic / instrumentation*