Purpose: To compare the sensitivity of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and arterial spin labeling to perfusion deficits in the lung.
Materials and methods: A rabbit model of pulmonary embolism was imaged with both flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery with an extra radiofrequency pulse (FAIRER) arterial spin labeling and Gd-DOTA enhanced MRI. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was measured in the area of the perfusion deficit and the normal lung for both techniques.
Results: The defect was readily visible in all images. The normal lung had an average of 3.8 +/- 1.2 times the SNR of the unperfused lung with the arterial spin labeling technique, and approximately 13.7 +/- 3.3 times the SNR with the contrast-enhanced technique.
Conclusion: Gd-DOTA enhanced MRI provides higher SNR in pulmonary perfusion imaging; however, arterial spin labeling is also adequate and may be used when repeated studies are indicated.
Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.