The change of the pacing rate in response to external vibration interference was assessed in four rate responsive pacemakers with a piezoelectric crystal (Medtronic Activitrax 8403, Siemens Sensolog 3, Biotronik Ergos 01, and Medtronic Legend 8417) and one with an accelerometer (CPI Excel VR 1119). They were tested in the laboratory. External vibration was simulated in vitro by exposing the different pacemakers to a controlled sinusoidal vibration force generated by a Millar pressure vibration amplifier type MGM-30 (Millar Instruments, Inc., Houston, TX, USA). All pacemakers were programmed at standard settings. Two types of vibration forces were applied: (1) one with varying amplitude but with constant vibration frequency; and (2) one with varying frequency but with constant vibration amplitude. In this manner curves of pacing rate versus vibration forces versus vibration frequency were obtained. High vibration forces and low vibration frequencies were associated with the highest pacing rate response. In this experimental setting, the pacemaker based on the accelerometer principle apparently was the least sensitive to high frequency vibrations, which are known to be related to environmental interference. It also seemed more appropriately responsive in the lower frequency range, which is more appropriate for the detection of true physiological activity.