Relative efficacy and safety of loratadine, hydroxyzine, and placebo in chronic idiopathic urticaria

Arzneimittelforschung. 1992 Sep;42(9):1119-21.

Abstract

The efficacy and safety of a new non-sedating antihistamine, loratadine (Clarityn, CAS 79794-75-5) 10 mg q.d., was compared to the classical antihistamine, hydroxyzine 25 mg t.i.d. and placebo in a 4-week (optional 12 week) randomized, double-blind, multi-center study in 203 patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria. Efficacy evaluations included weekly physician and patient assessments of pruritus, overall disease condition, and therapeutic response to treatment. Loratadine and hydroxyzine were significantly more effective than placebo and clinically comparable to each other as measured by all efficacy evaluations at each visit. Loratadine was safe and well tolerated with sedation and dry mouth similar to placebo and significantly less than hydroxyzine.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Chronic Disease
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Humans
  • Hydroxyzine / adverse effects
  • Hydroxyzine / therapeutic use*
  • Loratadine / adverse effects
  • Loratadine / therapeutic use*
  • Middle Aged
  • Pruritus / drug therapy
  • Pruritus / pathology
  • Urticaria / drug therapy*
  • Urticaria / pathology

Substances

  • Hydroxyzine
  • Loratadine