Breath test is very reliable for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in real clinical practice

Dig Liver Dis. 2003 Sep;35(9):612-8. doi: 10.1016/s1590-8658(03)00373-6.

Abstract

Aims: To determine the accuracy of the most common available tests for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in an unselected and untreated population of patients.

Patients and methods: Prospective study including 314 unselected patients from a population of 814 patients referred for upper endoscopy at one hospital. H. pylori infection was diagnosed by rapid urease test (RUT), histology, culture and 13C-urea-breath test (UBT) and serum IgG (EIA). H. pylori infection was defined as positive if culture or at least two of the other tests were positive.

Results: The prevalence of H. pylori infection in this population was 72%. The diagnostic test with the greatest combination of sensitivity (97%) and specificity (100%) was the UBT. EIA had a good sensitivity (96%), but it was the test with the least specificity (71%). RUT, histology and culture showed a high specificity (>98%) but a sensitivity lower than 90%. In elderly patients (>65 years old, n=120), UBT was also the test with the greatest combination of sensitivity (94%) and specificity (100%).

Conclusions: In conditions of real clinical practice the 13C-urea-breath test is a reliable test for H. pylori diagnosis, both in young and elderly patients.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Breath Tests* / methods
  • Female
  • Helicobacter Infections / diagnosis*
  • Helicobacter pylori*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prospective Studies
  • Reproducibility of Results