G-CSF in solid tumor chemotherapy: a tailored regimen reduces febrile neutropenia, treatment delays and direct costs

Med Sci Monit. 2004 Feb;10(2):PI24-8.

Abstract

Background: Current guidelines do not recommend G-CSF for patients with risk factors for neutropenia.

Material/methods: One-hundred patients undergoing chemotherapy were randomized to treatment with G-CSF at 5 Kg/kg for established febrile neutropenia (ANC <1000/microl) (Group A) or G-CSF at 263 Kg/day if ANC was 1500/microl or less on the day of the expected nadir, with the duration of treatment determined by the severity of neutropenia (Group B).

Results: The number of doses of G-CSF was similar in the two groups. There were 34 cases of febrile neutropenia in Group A, but none in Group B (p=0.0001). Hospital admission for febrile neutropenia, antibiotic use and delays in chemotherapy were all significantly more common in Group A. Total direct costs were estimated to be 66, 646 for Group A and 47, 119 for Group B.

Conclusions: Tailoring treatment does not increase G-CSF use, but significantly reduces febrile neutropenia and treatment delays and lowers direct costs.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / administration & dosage*
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / economics
  • Drug Administration Schedule
  • Female
  • Fever / blood
  • Fever / complications
  • Fever / drug therapy*
  • Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor / administration & dosage*
  • Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor / economics
  • Humans
  • Leukocyte Count
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasms / blood
  • Neoplasms / complications
  • Neoplasms / drug therapy*
  • Neutropenia / blood
  • Neutropenia / complications
  • Neutropenia / drug therapy*
  • Neutrophils / cytology
  • Neutrophils / drug effects

Substances

  • Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor