The loss in therapeutic ratio accompanying a conversion from low dose-rate (LDR) to high dose-rate (HDR) intracavitary brachytherapy (ICR) requires increased attention to the precision and accuracy of dose distribution calculations and treatment delivery. While the HDR-ICR treatment unit allows better custom-tailored dose distributions compared to LDR, it also requires more attention to detail to achieve the distribution desired. Because the relative biological effectiveness of different isodose levels in a dose distribution varies with the absolute dose (as described in Part 1 of this article), the relative dose distribution used with LDR must be modified for HDR to produce the same expected biological effect. Because of the difference in the radiobiology and physical positioning, simply duplicating applications as performed with LDR misses opportunities for dose distribution improvement as well as opens possibilities for significant complications. Due to differences in positioning the applicator (e.g., retraction of the cervix low in the pelvis instead of packing the applicator high), traditional definitions of points of interest (such as point A) apply poorly with HDR-ICR, compelling new systems of dose specification. With HDR-ICR, irreparable mistakes can happen very quickly, and quality assurance for the treatment plan and calculated dwell times prove much more important than with LDR. Key features of the dose distribution and constant relationships involving doses and dwell times help screen planned treatments for mistakes. This paper details the procedural and physical consideration of the Madison system for HDR-ICR brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix.