Reasons for revision hip surgery: a retrospective review

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Dec:(429):188-92. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000150126.73024.42.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the indications for contemporary revision hip surgery in a consecutive series of patients. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records and radiographs of 439 revision hip surgeries done between 1996 and 2003. Fifty-five percent of the surgeries were for aseptic loosening, 14% were for instability, 13% were for osteolysis around a well-fixed implant, 7% were for infection, 5% were for periprosthetic fracture, 3% were for conversion of a hemiarthroplasty, 1% was for psoas impingement, 1% was for loose recalled implants, and 1% was for implant fracture. As expected, aseptic loosening was the most common reason for revision surgery. Instability was a common reason for early revision whereas revision for osteolysis around a well-fixed implant was a more common reason for late revision.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Age Factors
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / adverse effects*
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / methods
  • Cohort Studies
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Joint Instability / surgery*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Postoperative Complications / surgery
  • Prosthesis Failure*
  • Prosthesis-Related Infections / surgery
  • Reoperation / methods
  • Reoperation / statistics & numerical data
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Assessment
  • Sex Factors
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome