Cementless metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty in patients less than 50 years of age: comparison with a matched control group using ceramic-on-polyethylene after a minimum 5-year follow-up

J Arthroplasty. 2004 Dec;19(8 Suppl 3):23-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.09.005.

Abstract

Thirty-nine cementless hip arthroplasties using metal-on-metal articulation were consecutively implanted in 30 patients less than 50 years of age and compared with a matched control group (by age, diagnosis, Devane activity, and Harris hip scores) of cementless arthroplasties using ceramic-on-polyethylene articulation. The Harris hip score at follow-up (minimum 5 years) for the metal-on-metal was 94.9 (range, 74-100). After the same follow-up, the results of the ceramic-on-polyethylene were significantly worse: 9 osteolyses and 7 surgical revisions related to wear (none in the metal-on-metal). Five-year survival rates were 97% +/-2% for the ceramic-on-polyethylene and 100% for the metal-on-metal. The metal-on-metal may be recommended to prevent wear problems in younger and more active patients; however, a longer follow-up is required to confirm this encouraging data.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Age Factors
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
  • Ceramics
  • Cobalt / blood
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Hip Prosthesis*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Metals
  • Middle Aged
  • Polyethylene
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Prosthesis Failure
  • Reoperation

Substances

  • Metals
  • Cobalt
  • Polyethylene