Can the level of immunosuppression in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients affect the reliability of human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 2 serological diagnosis?

Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2006 Jan;13(1):160-1. doi: 10.1128/CVI.13.1.160-161.2006.

Abstract

A total of 175 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive intravenous drug users (IDU) with CD4 cell counts of <200 cells/microl were matched with 175 HIV-positive IDU with CD4 cell counts of >500 cells/microl. Enzyme immunoassay (EIA) reactivity and human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 2 (HTLV-2) Western blot (WB) positivity were more frequently observed in subjects with CD4 cell counts of >500 cells/microl. Most of the subjects with low CD4 cell counts and EIA reactivity carried HTLV-2 infection (WB positive and/or PCR positive). No subjects with low CD4 cell counts and a lack of reactive EIA were PCR positive for HTLV-2. Therefore, a negative EIA result can confidently discharge HTLV-2 infection in HIV-infected patients with severe immunosuppression, whereas PCR should be performed for subjects with a reactive HTLV EIA which is not further confirmed by WB.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Blotting, Western
  • CD4 Antigens / immunology
  • HIV Infections / complications*
  • HTLV-II Infections / diagnosis*
  • HTLV-II Infections / immunology
  • Human T-lymphotropic virus 2 / isolation & purification*
  • Humans
  • Immunoassay
  • Immunocompetence
  • Immunosuppression Therapy*
  • Polymerase Chain Reaction
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Serologic Tests

Substances

  • CD4 Antigens