Tubal sterilization: complications of laparoscopy and minilaparotomy

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007 Sep;134(1):105-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.06.016. Epub 2006 Jul 26.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate whether intra- and post-operative morbidity varies according to the method used for female sterilization.

Study design: The database of the Swiss obstetric study group was analyzed for a period of 9 years. After the exclusion of cases with extraneous factors that may have influenced the operative outcome, three groups of patients were identified: (1) interval laparoscopic sterilization unrelated to pregnancy (n=20,325); (2) postpartum laparoscopic sterilization (n=2233); (3) postpartum sterilization by minilaparotomy (n=5095). Intra-operative and post-operative complications were compared according to the surgical approach.

Results: A total of 27,653 patients were included in the study. The proportion of major complications was higher in group 3 than in group 1 (0.39% versus 0.10%, odds ratio 4.0, 95% CI 2.15-7.44, p<0.001) but not statistically different between groups 1 (0.10%) and 2 (0.18%). Minor complications were statistically significantly more frequent in group 3 (0.82%) than in group 1 (0.26%) or group 2 (0.27%). There was no case of intra-operative or post-operative death in the study population.

Conclusion: When available, a laparoscopic approach should be chosen for female sterilization. After uneventful pregnancy course and delivery, it does not seem justified to delay the endoscopic sterilization to a later time.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Laparoscopy / adverse effects*
  • Laparotomy / adverse effects*
  • Morbidity
  • Postpartum Period
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Sterilization, Tubal / adverse effects*
  • Sterilization, Tubal / methods*