Long-term results of monoclonal anti-Il2-receptor antibody versus polyclonal antilymphocyte antibodies as induction therapy in renal transplantation

Transplant Proc. 2006 Sep;38(7):2298-9. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.06.133.

Abstract

We compared the influence of induction therapy on 5-year patient and graft survival as well as on renal function in 100 kidney graft recipients at low immunological risk treated with antilymphocyte globulin (n = 50) versus anti-IL-2R monoclonal antibody (n = 50) in a prospective multicenter study. Long-term immunosuppressive treatment included cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and a short course of steroids in all patients. Five year graft (86% vs 86%) and patient (94% vs 94%) survivals were identical in both study arms. Moreover, neither serum creatinine or proteinuria were significantly different between the two groups. Our results showed that the choice of the induction therapy seemed to not have a major impact on long-term outcomes among renal recipients at low immunological risk.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Antibodies, Monoclonal / immunology*
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal / therapeutic use
  • Antilymphocyte Serum / therapeutic use*
  • Basiliximab
  • Graft Survival / immunology*
  • Humans
  • Immunosuppression Therapy / methods
  • Kidney Transplantation / immunology*
  • Kidney Transplantation / mortality
  • Receptors, Interleukin-2 / immunology*
  • Recombinant Fusion Proteins / therapeutic use
  • Survival Analysis

Substances

  • Antibodies, Monoclonal
  • Antilymphocyte Serum
  • Receptors, Interleukin-2
  • Recombinant Fusion Proteins
  • Basiliximab
  • thymoglobulin