Can routine clinical markers be used longitudinally to monitor antiretroviral therapy success in resource-limited settings?

Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Jan 1;44(1):135-8. doi: 10.1086/510072. Epub 2006 Nov 28.

Abstract

Although routine clinical markers are used routinely to determine the stage of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease, their use in monitoring response to antiretroviral therapy is poorly defined. Selected clinical markers were evaluated for their ability to predict first-line antiretroviral therapy success. No clinically meaningful variables were identified that predicted virologic or immunological success, implying that the CD4+ cell count and HIV type 1 RNA level data are required for optimal management of antiretroviral therapy.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Anti-HIV Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Biomarkers / analysis*
  • CD4 Lymphocyte Count
  • Developing Countries*
  • Female
  • HIV Infections / drug therapy*
  • HIV Infections / immunology
  • HIV Infections / virology
  • HIV-1 / physiology
  • Hemoglobins / analysis
  • Humans
  • Lymphocyte Count
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Platelet Count
  • RNA, Viral / blood
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Viral Load

Substances

  • Anti-HIV Agents
  • Biomarkers
  • Hemoglobins
  • RNA, Viral