Single versus double occlusive dressing technique to minimize infusion thrombophlebitis: Vialon and Teflon cannulae reassessed

Anaesth Intensive Care. 1991 Nov;19(4):525-9. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9101900406.

Abstract

Infusion thrombophlebitis is the commonest complication of intravenous cannulation. This study was undertaken to prospectively evaluate a double-occlusive dressing technique and a new cannula, bismuth oxide-Teflon (Critikon Inc., Aust.), comparing it to Vialon (Deseret Medical Inc., Utah, USA). The study group of two hundred patients had a 16 gauge intravenous cannula inserted in theatre using a standard technique. The incidence of thrombophlebitis was determined on a daily basis. Cannula tips were sent for culture on removal. Vialon was found to be superior to Teflon after day 1. Although a double-occlusive dressing technique increased the duration of cannulation (50.9 vs. 41.9 hours, P less than 0.05), there was no difference in the incidence of thrombophlebitis. Neither cannula material nor dressing technique had an influence on the results of cannula tip culture (6% incidence). There was no evidence of bacteraemia in any case.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Bacteria / isolation & purification
  • Catheterization, Peripheral / adverse effects
  • Catheterization, Peripheral / instrumentation*
  • Catheterization, Peripheral / methods
  • Equipment Contamination
  • Equipment Design
  • Evaluation Studies as Topic
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Occlusive Dressings*
  • Polytetrafluoroethylene*
  • Polyurethanes*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Resins, Synthetic*
  • Thrombophlebitis / prevention & control*
  • Time Factors

Substances

  • Polyurethanes
  • Resins, Synthetic
  • Vialon
  • Polytetrafluoroethylene