[Vaginal hysterectomy using electrofusion: a study of 96 cases]

J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2008 Feb;37(1):82-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2007.10.002.
[Article in French]

Abstract

Objective: To compare ligature by electrofusion versus sutures in the practice of vaginal hysterectomy.

Study design: This is a retrospective study on 96 patients completed over a period of 47 months. Patients were allocated into two groups: the electrofusion "suture-free" group (n=54) and the "suture" control group (n=42). Designed-end points were operating time, postoperative pain, duration of postoperative hospitalization and perioperative complications.

Results: In the electrofusion group, the operating time was significantly reduced (51.3+/-22.6 min versus 67.6+/-20.1 min) as well as the reported postoperative pain (based on the visual analog scale - VAS) (1.9+/-2.0 versus 3.5+/-2.3). The average morphine consumption rate and the timing of postoperative morphine administration were lower in the electrofusion group (22.4+/-31.0mg versus 45.4+/-51.3 mg and 22.4+/-13.4 h versus 29.4+/-18.8 h, respectively). Moreover, in the electrofusion group there was less need for additional analgesics (1.9+/-2.0 versus 3.5+/-2.3) and the hospital-stay was shorter (4.2+/-1.3 days versus 5.0+/-1.0 days). There was no significant difference between the two groups in regard to perioperative complications.

Conclusion: The use of electrofusion in vaginal hysterectomy appears to be a reliable ligation technique which reduces significantly the operating time, the postoperative pain and the length of postoperative hospitalization.

Publication types

  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Electrosurgery / methods*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Hysterectomy, Vaginal / methods*
  • Intraoperative Complications / epidemiology
  • Length of Stay
  • Middle Aged
  • Pain, Postoperative / epidemiology
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Suture Techniques
  • Time Factors