Background: Coronary angiography is actually the gold standard to visualize coronary artery bypass graft patency and to detect bypass stenoses. However, it is an invasive examination that makes use of X-ray emission and it may lead to deleterious effects even at low dosage. Therefore, it is still needed a non-invasive examination with good diagnostic accuracy for the follow-up of patients with coronary artery bypass grafts. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a 40-row multidetector computed tomography scanner for the assessment of bypass surgery versus coronary angiography.
Methods: Twenty-six consecutive patients (20 male, 6 female, mean age 65 years) and a total number of 68 coronary bypass grafts (25 arterial and 43 venous grafts, 111 anastomoses) were examined by 40-row multidetector computed tomography.
Results: It was possible to analyze coronary artery bypass graft patency for every patient. At coronary angiography 23 patients showed bypass stenoses or occlusion: 19 of them were correctly diagnosed by computed tomography (sensitivity 84%, specificity 100%). In particular, computed tomography showed a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 100% for coronary artery bypass grafts, whereas it showed a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 94% for anastomoses.
Conclusions: On the basis of the results of our study, computed tomography is a valuable tool for assessing coronary artery bypass graft patency in patients with clinical suspect of coronary occlusion.