The importance of an organized follow-up for the evaluation of mortality after hospital discharge in cardiac surgery

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2008 May;7(3):449-51. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2007.171678. Epub 2008 Feb 13.

Abstract

Objectives: Does a structured follow-up, after cardiac surgery in an adult, provide additional information on the operation related mortality especially if mortality is used as an outcome parameter within the quality control?

Method: Mortality data of 1132 patients undergoing cardiac surgery in 2003 and 2004 in the Academic Hospital Nijmegen, The Netherlands were registered by a structured follow-up one year after surgery.

Results: One year after surgery this follow-up is missing information for eight patients (0.7%). Six patients (0.5%) refused further follow-up. Of the 31 patients who died during the first postoperative year, 21 (68%) were registered thanks to this structured follow-up. In 29 patients it was possible to retrieve the cause of death.

Conclusion: A structured follow-up one year after cardiac surgery has a high response and not only provides a better total picture of mortality, but also information on the cause of death. Both aspects are important if mortality is used as a parameter for quality control in cardiac surgery.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Cardiac Surgical Procedures / mortality*
  • Cardiac Surgical Procedures / standards
  • Cause of Death*
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Netherlands / epidemiology
  • Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care*
  • Patient Discharge / statistics & numerical data*
  • Program Evaluation
  • Registries
  • Time Factors