Preference for CD4-guided versus continuous HARRT in Thailand

AIDS Care. 2008 Mar;20(3):327-30. doi: 10.1080/09540120701660304.

Abstract

Nineteen patients who completed a 27-month CD4-guided structured treatment interruption (STI) trial that showed similar efficacy in STI and continuous arms were asked to choose CD4-guided versus continuous HAART after the study ended. Six chose STI and 13 chose continuous HAART. Reasons for not choosing STIs were fear of developing HIV-related illnesses (38%), fear of CD4 drop (30.8%), fear of viral load increase (7.7%) and ease (7.7%). Those who preferred CD4-guided HAART had a higher median CD4 count nadir during STI and fewer on-off cycles. This study provides an important insight into the preference of patients towards STI in a resource-limited setting.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Anti-HIV Agents / administration & dosage*
  • Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active / methods
  • CD4 Lymphocyte Count / methods*
  • Drug Administration Schedule
  • Female
  • HIV Infections / drug therapy*
  • HIV Infections / immunology
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Thailand
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Viral Load*

Substances

  • Anti-HIV Agents