Efficacy of preoperative endoscopic nasobiliary drainage for hilar cholangiocarcinoma

J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009;16(4):473-7. doi: 10.1007/s00534-009-0076-8. Epub 2009 Mar 20.

Abstract

Background/purpose: Although percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage has previously been recommended as a primary preoperative step, endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) is prevalent as an alternative procedure. Few reports assess the efficacy and safety of ENBD in a substantial patient cohort.

Methods: Of 116 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma who underwent surgery, 62 (43 men and 19 women, median age 69 years) underwent preoperative ENBD. After classification of lesions according to Bismuth-Corlette (B-C) criteria, we evaluated efficacy and safety with respect to B-C type.

Results: Patients were classified as B-C types I (n = 5), II (n = 21), IIIa (n = 23), IIIb (n = 5), and IV (n = 8). Preoperative single ENBD was effective in 46/62 patients (74%) including 5/5 (100%) B-C type I, 20/21 (94%) type II, 16/23 (70%) type IIIa, 4/5 (80%) type IIIb, and 1/8 (13%) type IV. Sixteen cases (26%) required additional drainages with ENBD or endoscopic biliary stenting (EBS) in 8/16 (50%), and with PTBD in 8/16 (50%). Mild acute pancreatitis (n = 1, 2%), segmental cholangitis (n = 2, 3%), and acute cholangitis with catheter obstruction (n = 7, 11%) occurred with ENBD.

Conclusions: Preoperative single ENBD in the future remnant lobe is effective treatment for B-C type I-III hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Preoperative ENBD was rarely complicated with segmental cholangitis.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Bile Duct Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic / surgery*
  • Cholangiocarcinoma / surgery*
  • Drainage / methods*
  • Female
  • Hepatectomy* / methods
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Treatment Outcome