Gastrectomy and esophagogastrectomy for proximal and distal gastric lesions: a comparison of open and laparoscopic procedures

Surg Innov. 2009 Jun;16(2):134-9. doi: 10.1177/1553350609336738. Epub 2009 May 25.

Abstract

Laparoscopic gastrectomy is safe for benign lesions; however, such surgery for cancer remains controversial. The aim of this study is to compare outcomes in open versus laparoscopic gastrectomy. Data on patients undergoing open (n = 15) or laparoscopic (n = 52) gastrectomy revealed a mean age of 61.7 and 70.5 years, respectively (P = .06). Mean operative time was 32.3 minutes longer in the laparoscopic group (P = .24). The difference in median length of hospital stay was 3 days (open 12 days, laparoscopic 9 days). Postoperative morbidity (< 30 days) was not different; however, there were more early respiratory complications in the open group (P = .009). There were 4/6 (66.7%) open and 2/29 (6.9%) cancer recurrences. Laparoscopic approach for treatment of gastric lesions is safe and does not have a deleterious effect on cancer-related outcome.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Cohort Studies
  • Esophagectomy / adverse effects
  • Esophagectomy / methods*
  • Esophagogastric Junction / pathology
  • Esophagogastric Junction / surgery
  • Female
  • Gastrectomy / adverse effects
  • Gastrectomy / methods*
  • Humans
  • Laparoscopy*
  • Length of Stay
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Stomach Diseases / mortality
  • Stomach Diseases / pathology
  • Stomach Diseases / surgery*
  • Treatment Outcome