Reliability and clinical validity of a Polish version of the CONTILIFE: a quality of life questionnaire for urinary incontinence

Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Jun;21(6):731-6. doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-1095-3. Epub 2010 Feb 10.

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: The primary aim of the study was to translate and validate a Polish version of the CONTILIFE, a quality of life questionnaire. The clinical validity of the CONTILIFE was assessed against the number of urinary leaks, Valsalva leak point pressure (VLPP), and maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP).

Methods: One hundred women with stress urinary incontinence completed a Polish version of the CONTILIFE twice with a 4-day interval.

Results: Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha= 0.94) and test-retest reliability of the instrument (ICC = 0.96) were very good. A significant relationship was found between all the CONTILIFE dimension scores, the CONTILIFE global score, and the number of urinary leaks per week. A less significant relationship was found between VLPP, MUCP, and CONTILIFE dimension and global scores.

Conclusions: A Polish version of the CONTILIFE can be a reliable measure of quality of life in stress urinary incontinence patients.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Poland
  • Quality of Life*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires / standards*
  • Urinary Incontinence, Stress / diagnosis
  • Urinary Incontinence, Stress / psychology*
  • Urodynamics