Comparison of efficacy of fluconazole mouthrinse and clotrimazole mouthpaint in the treatment of oral candidiasis

Aust Dent J. 2009 Dec;54(4):341-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2009.01160.x.

Abstract

Candidiasis is by far the most common oral fungal infection in humans and has a variety of clinical features. It is considered to be an opportunistic infection, affecting individuals who are debilitated by another disease. Fluconazole, one of the newer azoles available for systemic use and clotrimazole as a topical ointment are both shown to be effective in the treatment of oral candidiasis and are considered to be well tolerated and useful medications. No study has evaluated the comparison of clinical and mycological response of oral candidiasis to fluconazole mouthrinse and clotrimazole mouthpaint. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of fluconazole mouthrinse and compare it with clotrimazole mouthpaint in the treatment of oral candidiasis.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Controlled Clinical Trial

MeSH terms

  • Antifungal Agents / administration & dosage*
  • Candidiasis, Oral / complications
  • Candidiasis, Oral / drug therapy*
  • Candidiasis, Oral / pathology
  • Chi-Square Distribution
  • Clotrimazole / administration & dosage*
  • Colony Count, Microbial
  • Female
  • Fluconazole / administration & dosage*
  • Humans
  • Immunocompromised Host
  • Male
  • Mouthwashes / therapeutic use
  • Ointments / therapeutic use
  • Statistics, Nonparametric
  • Stomatitis, Denture / complications

Substances

  • Antifungal Agents
  • Mouthwashes
  • Ointments
  • Fluconazole
  • Clotrimazole