Using qualitative data from a program director's evaluation form as an outcome measurement for medical school

Mil Med. 2010 Jun;175(6):448-52. doi: 10.7205/milmed-d-09-00044.

Abstract

Background: Medical education programs need outcome measurements to promote curriculum improvement and to help meet accreditation standards.

Purpose: Determine the added value of qualitative comments written by program directors (PDs) in response to a survey concerning first postgraduate year (PGY-1) graduates. We hypothesized that these comments would serve as an additional outcome measurement for our graduates, adding information not readily captured in numeric data.

Methods: PD evaluation form surveys from 1993-2002. All qualitative comments offered in response to free text questions were coded and compared with numeric ratings.

Results: A total of 1,247 surveys were included (80% response rate). Comments about specific graduates were coded as positive, negative, or neutral and were categorized into themes. Inter-rater reliability was high (kappa= 0.82). Compared with 4% of graduates who received one or more numeric ratings of less than satisfactory, 7% had one or more qualitative phrases classified as negative.

Conclusions: Qualitative comments can serve as a useful outcome measurement.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Education, Medical / standards*
  • Educational Measurement / methods*
  • Humans
  • Military Medicine / education*
  • Program Evaluation / standards*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Schools, Medical / standards*
  • United States