Background: Lecture-based courses are common in orthopaedic surgery; however, their effectiveness in improving medical knowledge has not been widely assessed. The Orthopaedic Trauma Association conducts a resident trauma course that occurs four to six weeks prior to the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination (OITE). The purposes of this study were to determine whether residents who had taken this course performed better on the trauma domain of the OITE and to compare the effect of the course with the effect of a focused rotation in orthopaedic trauma.
Methods: The percentile scores on the trauma domain of the OITE for forty-seven residents in postgraduate year (PGY) 2 were reviewed. Twenty-nine residents who took a trauma course within six weeks before the OITE were compared with eighteen residents who took the course after the OITE. As a secondary analysis, the effect of a trauma rotation for the same PGY-2 residents before and after the OITE was also assessed. Baseline orthopaedic knowledge was assessed with use of the overall OITE percentage scores.
Results: The trauma domain scores were not significantly better among the residents who took the course (mean and standard deviation, 62.2 ± 9.9) compared with those who had not taken it (mean, 59.2 ± 6.2) (p = 0.2). A significant difference (p = 0.04) was found for a trauma rotation, with the residents who had a trauma rotation scoring better (mean, 64.5 ± 6.8) than the residents who had not (mean, 58.8 ± 8.9). The subgroup of residents who had both a course and a trauma rotation before the test scored significantly better (p = 0.01) than the subgroup that had neither of these experiences before the test (mean, 65.6 ± 8.0 and 56.9 ± 6.4, respectively).
Conclusions: An orthopaedic trauma course alone does not enhance an orthopaedic resident's trauma medical knowledge as assessed on a standardized test. However, a trauma rotation before, and in particular the combination of both a course and a trauma rotation, can improve trauma test scores.