Abstract
A 50-year-old man was admitted with a suspected acute coronary syndrome. The coronary angiogram, however, was normal. He was found to have a cardiomyopathy and eosinophilia. The diagnosis was established as a perimyocarditis secondary to the Churg-Strauss syndrome. An important question is whether an endomyocardial biopsy should have been performed.
MeSH terms
-
Acute Coronary Syndrome / diagnosis*
-
Acute Coronary Syndrome / diagnostic imaging
-
Biopsy, Needle / methods*
-
Cardiomyopathies / diagnosis
-
Cardiomyopathies / pathology*
-
Churg-Strauss Syndrome / diagnosis*
-
Churg-Strauss Syndrome / drug therapy
-
Churg-Strauss Syndrome / pathology
-
Coronary Angiography / methods
-
Diagnosis, Differential
-
Echocardiography, Doppler
-
Eosinophilia / diagnosis*
-
Follow-Up Studies
-
Humans
-
Magnetic Resonance Imaging / methods
-
Male
-
Risk Assessment
-
Steroids / therapeutic use