Impact of abciximab in elderly patients with high-risk acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: an observational registry study

Drugs Aging. 2011 May 1;28(5):369-78. doi: 10.2165/11587170-000000000-00000.

Abstract

Background: An increasing proportion of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are classified as elderly (aged ≥70 years). The glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor abciximab is known to reduce adverse outcomes in patients aged <70 years with high-risk ACS undergoing PCI, but conflicting findings relating to its effects in the elderly have been reported.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of abciximab in elderly high-risk ACS patients undergoing PCI.

Methods: From our dedicated PCI registry we identified 2068 ACS patients with high-risk lesions that were treated with PCI. Baseline data were collected prospectively. All-cause mortality, target vessel revascularization (TVR), myocardial infarction (MI), and the combination of these were primary study endpoints. All endpoints within 1 year after PCI were registered and validated. The population was subsequently stratified according to age and use of abciximab.

Results: Elderly patients constituted 42% of the total population. They presented with more co-morbidities, were less frequently treated with abciximab and had a higher risk of reaching the combined endpoint and higher all-cause mortality than younger patients. The age/abciximab stratified analysis revealed no effect of abciximab on any of the endpoints in elderly patients (combined endpoint: no abciximab 22.6% vs abciximab 23.4%, p=0.85; all-cause mortality: no abciximab 15.4% vs abciximab 15.9%, p=0.91; TVR: no abciximab 3.4% vs abciximab 5.5%, p=0.21; MI: no abciximab 7.0% vs abciximab 8.5%, p=0.54), whereas all-cause mortality and the risk of reaching the combined endpoint were significantly reduced in younger patients (combined endpoint: no abciximab 14.0% vs abciximab 9.4%, p=0.03; all-cause mortality: no abciximab 4.5% vs abciximab 1.7%, p=0.02; TVR: no abciximab 5.5% vs abciximab 4.3%, p=0.39; MI: no abciximab 7.2% vs abciximab 6.6%, p=0.80). These findings were confirmed in our adjusted analyses.

Conclusions: In this large observational study we found no benefit of abciximab treatment in elderly high-risk ACS patients who underwent PCI. These findings should be taken into consideration when deciding on the treatment strategy for elderly ACS patients undergoing PCI.

MeSH terms

  • Abciximab
  • Acute Coronary Syndrome / drug therapy*
  • Acute Coronary Syndrome / therapy*
  • Aged
  • Angioplasty*
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal / pharmacology*
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal / therapeutic use*
  • Endpoint Determination
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Immunoglobulin Fab Fragments / pharmacology*
  • Immunoglobulin Fab Fragments / therapeutic use*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex / antagonists & inhibitors
  • Registries*
  • Risk

Substances

  • Antibodies, Monoclonal
  • Immunoglobulin Fab Fragments
  • Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex
  • Abciximab