[Does the use of a polyurethane patch in the CVC dressing further reduce the risk of infection compared with sterile gauze dressing?]

Infez Med. 2011 Jun;19(2):67-73.
[Article in Italian]

Abstract

Half of the patients hospitalized in intensive care units have a central venous catheter (CVC) inserted. Management of CVC is not simple and the wrong medication on the insertion site may cause many complications including sepsis. Among the various modes of dressing are transparent polyurethane patches and sterile gauze, and both have both advantages and drawbacks. The aim of this literature review is to compare these two methods in terms of effectiveness in reducing infections. Seven bio-medical databases of the primary and secondary literature were consulted. We considered all articles published in the last five years, in Italian or English, and research that studies purely human subjects. Moreover, the work was limited to all RCT, all systematic reviews and guidelines published on the databases consulted. Only five studies tackled the research question. The results show that CVC-related infections are a frequent problem in intensive care units. This research found two systematic reviews and two randomized controlled trials. None of the studies show any evidence of the type of dressing applied to the CVC. In conclusion, despite consulting several databases, we found no evidence recommending the type of medication to apply.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • English Abstract
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Bandages*
  • Catheter-Related Infections / etiology*
  • Catheter-Related Infections / prevention & control*
  • Catheterization, Central Venous / adverse effects*
  • Catheterization, Central Venous / standards*
  • Humans
  • Polyurethanes*

Substances

  • Polyurethanes