Purpose: No consensus has been reached on the use of prostheses in a potentially infected operating field. In this study, we evaluated the validity of a mesh prosthesis for the repair of incarcerated groin hernias with intestinal resection.
Methods: Twenty-seven patients underwent operations for correction of incarcerated groin hernias with small intestinal resection at our hospital between January 2000 and March 2010. The patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent repair with a prosthetic mesh and those who underwent primary hernia repair. Patients with intestinal perforations, abscess formations, panperitonitis, and those who required colon resections were excluded. The length of the operation, blood loss, and incidences of surgical site infection, postoperative ileus, and recurrence were evaluated in each group.
Results: Of the 27 patients studied, 10 (37%) underwent tension-free repair with a mesh, and 17 (63%) underwent primary hernia repair. Although the patients who underwent primary hernia repair were significantly older than the patients who underwent mesh repair (P = 0.015), no statistically significant differences in morbidity, including surgical site infection, or mortality, were identified.
Conclusion: Strangulated inguinal hernias cannot be considered a contraindication to the use of a prosthetic mesh even in cases requiring small-intestinal resection.