Allergic reaction to suture material after an ICD procedure: device infection mimicry

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012 Mar;23(3):330-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2011.02224.x. Epub 2011 Nov 14.

Abstract

When an implanted device is infected, complete explantation of the device system, including lead extraction, is usually required. Superficial problems with wound healing may be managed more conservatively, but distinguishing between a surface process and deeper infection can pose a clinical challenge. We present a case of poor wound healing after an ICD pocket revision procedure, and an allergic reaction to the suture material was found to be the cause. Diagnosis, management, and future implications of suture allergy are discussed.

Publication types

  • Case Reports

MeSH terms

  • Biocompatible Materials / adverse effects
  • Defibrillators, Implantable*
  • Diagnosis, Differential
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Hypersensitivity / diagnosis*
  • Middle Aged
  • Prosthesis Implantation / adverse effects*
  • Prosthesis-Related Infections / diagnosis*
  • Reoperation
  • Skin Tests
  • Sutures / adverse effects*
  • Tachycardia, Ventricular / complications
  • Tachycardia, Ventricular / therapy
  • Tetralogy of Fallot / complications
  • Tetralogy of Fallot / therapy
  • Wound Healing

Substances

  • Biocompatible Materials