Comparison of eight commercial enzyme immunoassays for the detection of Clostridium difficile from stool samples and effect of strain type

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012 May;73(1):94-6. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.01.005. Epub 2012 Mar 15.

Abstract

We compared the performance of 8 Clostridium difficile enzyme immunoassays to cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay and toxigenic culture. The effect of strain type on assay performance was also examined. There were a total of 71 (14.4%) samples in which C. difficile was recovered; 58 (81.7%) of 71 were toxigenic. Compared to a composite reference standard of either C. difficile cytotoxin assay positive or toxigenic C. difficile culture positive, the sensitivities of these assays varied from 31.7% to 55.2%, while the specificities were excellent, ranging from 98.1% to 100%. Among the 57 C. difficile isolates, 30 (51.7%) were of the NAP1 genotype. Stool samples positive for the C. difficile NAP1 strain had a higher positivity rate for the toxin assays.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Bacterial Toxins / analysis*
  • Bacterial Toxins / toxicity
  • Bacteriological Techniques / methods*
  • Cell Culture Techniques / methods
  • Cell Survival
  • Clostridioides difficile / classification
  • Clostridioides difficile / isolation & purification*
  • Clostridioides difficile / pathogenicity
  • Clostridium Infections / diagnosis
  • Clostridium Infections / microbiology*
  • Feces / chemistry
  • Feces / microbiology*
  • Humans
  • Immunoenzyme Techniques / methods
  • Sensitivity and Specificity

Substances

  • Bacterial Toxins