Abdominal wall reconstruction using a non-cross-linked porcine dermal scaffold: a follow-up study

Hernia. 2013 Feb;17(1):37-44. doi: 10.1007/s10029-012-0927-0. Epub 2012 Jun 16.

Abstract

Purpose: In a previous study, we have shown that non-cross-linked porcine dermal scaffolds (NCPDS) are a safe and effective alternative to prosthetic mesh in the reconstruction of complicated abdominal wall defects. Here, we report the long-term outcomes of abdominal wall reconstruction using NCPDS in a larger patient population.

Methods: Patients who underwent abdominal wall reconstruction with NCPDS between May 2006 and December 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Analysis of demographics, indications for NCPDS placement, surgical technique, complications, and follow-up data was performed.

Results: NCPDS was used for abdominal wall repair in 40 patients. In all patients, NCPDS was positioned using an intraperitoneal technique. At a mean follow-up time of 40.1 months, most patients had successful outcomes. Complications included seroma (21 %), recurrence (7.9 %), and infection (5.2 %); these rates are comparable to our initial report. Two patients died from multi-organ failure unrelated to NCPDS placement.

Conclusions: This study shows that complex abdominal wall defects can be successfully reconstructed using NCPDS with a low rate of recurrence and complications.

MeSH terms

  • Abdominoplasty / adverse effects
  • Abdominoplasty / methods*
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Bioprosthesis*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Hernia, Ventral / surgery
  • Herniorrhaphy / adverse effects
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Recurrence
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Seroma / etiology
  • Surgical Wound Infection / etiology*
  • Time Factors
  • Tissue Scaffolds*
  • Young Adult