[Pelvic radiotherapy and artificial urinary sphincter in women]

Prog Urol. 2012 Jul;22(9):534-9. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2012.03.005. Epub 2012 Apr 25.
[Article in French]

Abstract

Objectives: A retrospective evaluation of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation in women with previous pelvic radiotherapy (PR).

Population and methods: From May 1987 to December 2009, on the 215 women implanted with AUS, nine (4.2%) had previous PR. We compared two groups of women, the first one without PR (group 1; n=206) and the other group with PR (group 2; n=9). Previous preop. urodynamics were realized. Patients using more than one pad per day at the end of follow-up were considered in failure.

Results: Mean follow-up for these two groups was 6 years (SD: 5.6 years), with a mean age of 62.8 years. Mean delay between PR and surgery was 14 years. PR was indicated for cervix cancer in 78% (7/9), endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer in 9% (1/9) each. PR was responsible of an increased rate of AUS erosion and explantation (P<0.001). In group 2, more than half of women had AUS failure and 60% for AUS erosion, versus 22% and 26% respectively in group 1. In group 2, all the AUS eroded were explanted, one third of women, with a mean delay of 59.8 months (4-140) with AUS implantation.

Conclusion: AUS implantation in a female population with previous PR is not necessary inconsistent, but the failure rate is high. This difficult surgery should be reserved for specialized centres.

Publication types

  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Urinary Incontinence, Stress / surgery*
  • Urinary Sphincter, Artificial*
  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / radiotherapy*