Background: As a lethal autosomal recessive hereditary disorder, childhood spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is caused by mutations of the survival motor neuron 1 (SMN1) gene. Most of the patients died at early stage or were seriously disabled, which accounts partly for the scarcity of two continuous generations with SMA. Increasing evidence indicated that SMN2 copy number was a modifier of SMA, but in majority of sporadic patients, the bias of phenotype judgments may largely reduce the accuracy of genotype-phenotype analysis.
Methods: We presented two families with SMN1-deleted individuals in two continuous generations, the father and daughter of family 1 and the mother and daughter of family 2 were determined to be homozygous for the deletion of the SMN1 gene. Quantitative analysis of SMN1 and SMN2 was carried out by real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.
Results: Quantitative analysis showed that the father of family 1 possessed three copies of SMN2, and his daughter had only two SMN2 copies; the slightly affected mother of family 2 had three copies of SMN2, but her sick daughter had only two copies of SMN2; we also performed prenatal prediction for family 1 and a healthy boy was born under our suggestion.
Conclusion: For the phenotypes of patients from different generations within the same family are obviously different, the results of a genotype-phenotype analysis may be more convincing, which strongly support the hypothesis that SMN2 is an important modifier for SMA, and SMN2 copy number should be considered in the prenatal diagnosis situation.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.