Who's covering our loved ones: surprising barriers in the sign-out process

Am J Surg. 2013 Jan;205(1):77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.05.009. Epub 2012 Sep 7.

Abstract

Background: The aims of this study were to characterize obstacles affecting current sign-out practices and to evaluate the potential impact of standardized sign-out guidelines.

Methods: In June 2011, detailed guidelines for transitions of care were implemented, and a 29-item multiple-choice survey was developed to assess sign-out practices, attitudes, and barriers to effective communication. Surveys were administered to residents and nurses at 3 time points. Comparisons between time points were assessed using t tests and χ(2) tests (α = .05).

Results: Guideline implementation achieved nonsignificant improvements in satisfaction with sign-outs, perceptions of patient safety, adequacy of information provided in sign-out, and patient knowledge by on-call residents. On follow-up, concerns surfaced regarding less complete sign-out processes due to new duty-hour restrictions.

Conclusions: Guideline implementation mildly improved perceptions of safety and adequacy of sign-out; however, persistent barriers to continuity of care remain. Sign-out standardization may not adequately ensure patient safety, and further efforts to improve handoff processes are in need.

MeSH terms

  • Attitude of Health Personnel*
  • Continuity of Patient Care / standards*
  • General Surgery / education
  • Humans
  • Internship and Residency*
  • Minnesota
  • Nursing Staff, Hospital*
  • Patient Handoff / standards*
  • Patient Safety
  • Personnel Staffing and Scheduling
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic*
  • Practice Patterns, Nurses' / statistics & numerical data
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians' / statistics & numerical data
  • Surveys and Questionnaires