Two stretching treatments for the hamstrings: proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation versus kinesio taping

J Sport Rehabil. 2013 Feb;22(1):59-66. doi: 10.1123/jsr.22.1.59. Epub 2012 Oct 11.

Abstract

Context: Recent studies have shown that the static stretch (SS) may adversely affect leg-muscle performance.

Objectives: The authors examined the short-term effects of 2 stretching exercises on hamstrings muscle before and after exercise.

Design: Crossover.

Setting: Laboratory.

Participants: 9 healthy, physically active men.

Interventions: There were 3 protocols in a randomized order with a 7-d interval: nonstretching (CON protocol), hamstrings static stretching (SS) with proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF), and SS with kinesio-taping application on the hamstrings.

Main outcome measures: Outcome measures included first-felt and maximum tolerant-felt range of motion (FROM and TROM), maximal knee-flexion peak torque (PT) at 180°/s, and hamstrings muscle stiffness.

Results: Groups were not different at prestretching in terms of hamstrings flexibility, PT, and muscle stiffness. At poststretching, both stretching protocols showed significant increases in FROM and TROM (P < .05). Stiffer hamstrings muscle and decreased PT were found in both SS+PNF and CON protocols (P < .05). However, there was no significant difference in the SS+Taping protocol (P > .05).

Conclusion: The stretching protocols improve hamstrings flexibility immediately, but after exercise hamstrings peak torque is diminished in the SS+PNF but not in the SS+Taping group. This means that SS+Taping can prevent negative results from exercise, which may prevent muscle injury.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Athletic Tape / standards*
  • Cross-Over Studies
  • Exercise / physiology
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Muscle Stretching Exercises / methods*
  • Muscle, Skeletal / physiology*
  • Proprioception / physiology*
  • Thigh