[Hemodiafiltration with high-level ultrafiltration versus hemodialysis. Longitudinal study]

Minerva Urol Nefrol. 1990 Jan-Mar;42(1):31-4.
[Article in Italian]

Abstract

A group of well nourished young patients was examined during 2 longterm consecutive high efficiency dialytic schedules to detect possible clinical and biochemical differences. The patients were first studied during hemodialysis with a 1.2 m2 cuprophan membrane and blood flow of 400 ml/min and, then, during hemodiafiltration with an ultrafiltration rate greater than 100 ml/min by using high permeability membranes with a surface greater than or equal to 1.4 m2. As expected by the higher clearances obtained on hemodiafiltration, this technique resulted in a significant reduction of dialysis time and of BUN and serum creatinine, associated with a significant increase of hemoglobin, possibly related to a better deintoxication. Furthermore, the dry body weight decreased significantly during hemodialysis, whereas it increased significantly during hemodiafiltration, despite unchanged dietary habits, indicating possible differences in the nutrients utilization during the 2 dialytic schedules. Therefore, in chronically dialyzed patients, highly permeable synthetic membranes should be preferred to cuprophan because of a supposed better biocompatibility and should be used with the highest ultrafiltration rate in order to obtain a better dialytic efficiency and to avoid the risk of backfiltration.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Blood Urea Nitrogen
  • Body Weight
  • Evaluation Studies as Topic
  • Female
  • Hemofiltration* / methods
  • Hemoglobins / analysis
  • Humans
  • Kidney Failure, Chronic / metabolism
  • Kidney Failure, Chronic / therapy*
  • Longitudinal Studies
  • Male
  • Membranes, Artificial
  • Middle Aged
  • Renal Dialysis*

Substances

  • Hemoglobins
  • Membranes, Artificial