Improved anatomical reproducibility in quantitative lower-limb muscle MRI

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Apr;39(4):1033-8. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24220. Epub 2013 Oct 7.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the influence of two limb positions and slice prescription using scout-image-based and surface-anatomy-based methods on the reproducibility of quantitative MRI of lower-limb muscles.

Materials and methods: Ten healthy subjects were scanned at 3 Tesla with a two-dimensional turbo spin-echo T1-weighted acquisition. Imaging was performed at thigh and calf level in two subject limb positions and independently repeated by a second operator. Regions-of-interest (ROI) were drawn on three muscles at thigh and calf levels on axial slices at fixed distance from the knee joint and at a level determined by surface anatomy.

Results: Test-retest reliability of muscle cross-sectional area and ROI area overlap were similar for both limb positioning methods. Changing limb position between scans reduced ROI overlap (P < 0.01). Scout-image-based slice prescription resulted in narrower limits of agreement and higher intraclass correlation coefficients compared with surface-anatomy-based slice prescription.

Conclusion: Slice prescription based on fixed distance from the knee joint provided superior reproducibility of slice location than a surface anatomy-based method and should be used for longitudinal quantitative MRI studies. Exact subject positioning will depend on scanner and coil configuration, but should be consistent through a longitudinal study.

Keywords: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); muscle; patient positioning; quantitative MRI; repeatability.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Algorithms*
  • Anatomic Landmarks / anatomy & histology*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Image Enhancement / methods*
  • Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / methods*
  • Lower Extremity
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging / methods*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Muscle, Skeletal / anatomy & histology*
  • Reference Values
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sensitivity and Specificity