Background: We sought to compare the impact of sequential and contemporaneous revascularizations of portal vein and hepatic artery on biliary complications in patients undergoing liver transplantation.
Methods: We reviewed 184 patients who underwent liver transplantation in our center, and categorized them into different groups based on the duration of time between the portal venous and hepatic arterial reperfusion: >10 minutes in the sequential portal and hepatic artery revascularization group (SPA; n = 56), and within 1 minute in the contemporaneous portal and hepatic artery revascularization group (CPA; n = 121).The other patients with an interval from 1-10 minutes (n = 7) were excluded. This study then compared the outcomes between the SPA and CPA groups.
Results: Cold ischemic time (mean ± standard deviation) for the SPA and CPA groups were 561 ± 150 vs 577 ± 187 minutes, respectively (P = .53). The incidence of biliary complications for the SPA and CPA groups were 14/56 and 11/121, respectively (25% vs 9%; P = .005). By the Clavien-Dindo Classification of Surgical Complications, the biliary complications in SPA group tended to be more severe compared with the CPA group (grade I, 0% vs 0%; II, 14% vs 36%; IIIa, 71% vs 64%; IIIb, 7% vs 0%; IV, 7% vs 0%; P = .10). Among biliary complications, the incidence of nonanatomic strictures was greater in the SPA group (9% vs 2%; P = .03), whereas the difference was not significant for anastomotic strictures (P = .054). Except for a lower serum albumin level in the SPA group 1 day after liver transplantation (P < .001), there are no differences in post-transplant liver function or renal function at 1, 7, and 30 days after transplantation.
Conclusion: The CPA protocol can decrease the incidence of biliary complications substantially after liver transplantation and should replace the SPA protocol used by some centers in liver transplantation.
Copyright © 2014 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.