Problems with PEG-based precipitation methods in the determination of HDL2- and HDL3-cholesterol

Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1987 Nov;47(7):705-8. doi: 10.1080/00365518709168933.

Abstract

In this study a comparison of two polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based precipitation methods, that is, one using PEG-6000/DS-15000 and the other using two different concentrations of PEG-20000 are presented. The total HDL-cholesterol values measured with the PEG-6000 procedure were higher (13%) than those measured with PEG-20000 (r = 0.91) in 16 pooled serum samples tested. The HDL2- and HDL3-cholesterol values measured with the two methods differed markedly from each other in spite of the moderate correlation (HDL2: r = 0.74; HDL3: r = 0.26) observed. The advantage of the PEG-20000 method as compared with the other method was its simplicity and rapidity. The separation of HDL2/HDL3 is more or less arbitrary in both methods used and further studies are needed for the estimation of optimal conditions for subclass separation.

MeSH terms

  • Chemical Precipitation
  • Cholesterol, HDL / analysis*
  • Dextran Sulfate
  • Dextrans
  • Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
  • Lipoproteins, HDL / analysis*
  • Lipoproteins, HDL2
  • Lipoproteins, HDL3
  • Magnesium
  • Magnesium Chloride
  • Polyethylene Glycols*

Substances

  • Cholesterol, HDL
  • Dextrans
  • Lipoproteins, HDL
  • Lipoproteins, HDL2
  • Lipoproteins, HDL3
  • Magnesium Chloride
  • Polyethylene Glycols
  • Dextran Sulfate
  • Magnesium