Prediction of MS disability by multimodal evoked potentials: investigation during relapse or in the relapse-free interval?

Clin Neurophysiol. 2014 Sep;125(9):1889-92. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.12.117. Epub 2014 Jan 31.

Abstract

Objective: Little is known about optimal timing of multimodal evoked potential (EP)-investigations regarding prediction of MS disability. The aim of this study was to investigate whether timing of EP-investigations during a relapse or in the relapse-free interval influences prediction of MS disability.

Methods: Two groups of MS patients with similar age and gender distributions received visual, motor and somatosensory EPs either during a relapse (Group 1) or in the relapse-free interval (Group 2). Expanded Disability Status Score (EDSS) was obtained at baseline (T0) and year 3 (T2). Linear regression analysis was performed to examine the association between EDSS(T2) and a baseline EP compound measure (s-EP-Q(T0)) for each group.

Results: Median EDSS(T0) was 3.0 for Group 1 and 1.5 for Group 2. Mean disease durations were 2.0 and 2.8 years, respectively. Median EDSS(T2) was 2.0 for both groups. The s-EP-Q(T0) significantly predicted EDSS(T2) (R(2)=0.47) for patients in Group 2, but not for patients in Group 1 (R(2)=0.07).

Conclusion: In early MS the functional remnants of relapses are a better predictor for development of medium-term disability than is the extent of impulse propagation impairment measured during relapse.

Significance: This suggests a role of multimodal EPs in prediction of MS disability if performed in the relapse-free interval.

Keywords: Disability; Evoked potentials; Multiple sclerosis; Prediction; Relapse.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Disability Evaluation*
  • Disabled Persons
  • Electroencephalography
  • Evoked Potentials / physiology*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Multiple Sclerosis / physiopathology*
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Recurrence