What is the optimal level of vitamin D? - separating the evidence from the rhetoric

Aust Fam Physician. 2014 Mar;43(3):119-22.

Abstract

Background: Vitamin D deficiency is thought to be common in Australia. It is unclear when vitamin D supplementation should be prescribed.

Objective: We assess the evidence that guides clinical decision-making on supplementation with vitamin D following a vitamin D test result.

Discussion: Vitamin D assays are inconsistent and inaccurate and there is weak evidence around the level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) that is optimal. Evidence of links between vitamin D deficiency and disease come from observational studies and there is little support from randomised controlled trials of vitamin D supplementation. Where there is evidence of a link, increased risk is largely confined to very low 25(OH)D levels, with minimal health gains for 25(OH)D levels greater than 50 nmol/L. New evidence indicates that both high and low 25(OH)D levels may be associated with increased health risks. Taken together these considerations present a considerable challenge to clinical decision-making around treatment on the basis of 25(OH)D levels.

MeSH terms

  • Australia / epidemiology
  • Dietary Supplements
  • Evidence-Based Medicine*
  • Humans
  • Immunoassay / standards
  • Meta-Analysis as Topic
  • Observational Studies as Topic
  • Risk Factors
  • Vitamin D / analogs & derivatives
  • Vitamin D / blood*
  • Vitamin D / therapeutic use
  • Vitamin D Deficiency / diagnosis*
  • Vitamin D Deficiency / drug therapy*
  • Vitamin D Deficiency / epidemiology

Substances

  • Vitamin D
  • 25-hydroxyvitamin D