Patients with hip fracture admitted to critical care: epidemiology, interventions and outcome

Injury. 2014 Jul;45(7):1066-70. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.02.037. Epub 2014 Mar 11.

Abstract

Introduction: Although there is much current debate about the use of critical care to enhance peri-operative care of patients with hip fracture there are limited supporting data. We investigated the epidemiology, critical care interventions and outcomes of patients with hip fracture admitted to a large UK critical care unit.

Patients and methods: We reviewed all patients with hip fracture (excluding those with multiple trauma, and those with femoral shaft or peri-prosthetic fracture) who were admitted to our critical care unit during a four year period. We recorded patient characteristics, reason for admission to critical care, interventions and organ support performed, and patient outcome.

Results: We identified 99 patients with a mean age of 81 years; this represented 1% of patients admitted to critical care, and 2.4% of patients with hip fracture admitted to hospital during the study period. Fifty-two patients required no organ support; 19 received only respiratory support, 13 only cardiovascular support, 12 received both respiratory and cardiovascular support, and 3 received respiratory, cardiovascular and renal support. Outcome worsened as the level of organ support increased (p=0.01). Fifteen patients died in critical care, acute hospital mortality was 33% and 1-year mortality was 54%. No patient for whom admission was planned before surgery died in critical care and the 30-day mortality for this group was 13%. Outcome was related to the time between surgery and critical care admission: patients admitted before surgery or longer than 2 days after surgery had worse outcomes (p=0.001). The reason for admission to critical care also influenced outcome: patients with sepsis had poor outcome with one-third dying in critical care and a further one-third not surviving to hospital discharge.

Conclusions: The major determinants of outcome in this population were reason for admission, and timing of admission to critical care. One year survival was better than that for unselected patients aged >80 years admitted to critical care. Admission to critical care and use of enhanced peri-operative care for selected hip fracture patients is entirely appropriate and beneficial.

Keywords: Complication; Critical care; Geriatric fracture; Hip fracture; Mortality; Organ support; Outcome.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Comorbidity
  • Critical Care*
  • Female
  • Hip Fractures / complications
  • Hip Fractures / epidemiology*
  • Hip Fractures / mortality
  • Hip Fractures / surgery*
  • Hospital Mortality
  • Hospitalization / statistics & numerical data*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Treatment Outcome
  • United Kingdom / epidemiology