Loss of continuous biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients: incidence, causes, and outcomes

Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2013 May;66(5):377-83. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2012.11.001. Epub 2013 Jan 15.

Abstract

Introduction and objectives: In recent years, implantation of cardiac resynchronization therapy devices has significantly increased. The benefits of this therapy are directly related to the maintenance of continuous biventricular pacing. This study analyzed the incidence, causes, and outcomes of loss of continuous biventricular pacing, and the approach adopted.

Methods: We analyzed the clinical and follow-up data of a series of consecutive patients from a single center who underwent implantation of a cardiac resynchronization therapy device.

Results: The study included 136 patients. During a mean follow-up of 33.4 months, loss of continuous biventricular pacing occurred in 45 patients (33%). The most common causes included atrial tachyarrhythmias (21.3%), lead macrodislodgement (18%), and loss of left ventricular capture (13.1%). In most patients (88.5%), loss of continuous biventricular pacing was transient and correctable, and occurred earlier in the follow-up when the cause was lead macrodislodgement, oversensing, or extracardiac stimulation. There were no significant differences in mortality between patients with and without loss of continuous biventricular pacing (P=.88).

Conclusions: Despite technical advances in cardiac resynchronization therapy, loss of continuous biventricular pacing is common; however, this loss can usually be corrected. In most patients, continuous biventricular pacing can be ensured by close monitoring and follow-up and a proactive approach.

Publication types

  • Observational Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices*
  • Equipment Failure / statistics & numerical data
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Prospective Studies
  • Retrospective Studies